Well, if I am correct...I think that Abercrombie owns Hollister...and sadly these companies display pictures of barely clothed people modeling in the pictures in their stores. I think that this advocates a certain class of people or at least appeals to a certain generation that is widely influenced by sex and provocativeness. I also think that they only want rich or people who are so branded by today's marketing and advertising that they will spend so much money just to fit into a class of people who can afford to waste money.The way Hollister Co. shapes, controls, even advocates certain class/ socioeconomic structures in our society?
Well, i personally think that hollister stuff all looks the same and i think that if u really want to spend that much money on some holey pants and a shirt that is super thin, go for it. But my younger sister seems to think in order to be popular u have to look like hollister and buy their clothing, and basically... we can't afford that. So in a sense Hollister sets society apart: the people willing to splurge on clothing, and those who dress according to their budget and their lifestyle, because hollister all looks the same (beachy)
i guess i really dont understand what your asking, but i honestly can say that i dont care much for hollister because with their stores if your not tall and super skinny then your not going to find any clothes that fit you. so maybe that will help you out some. im not sure!
No comments:
Post a Comment